Lifestyle Declaration in the Armed Services - 763 Words

In 1993 President Bill Clinton signed a law that set the policy of â€Å"don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue, and don’t harass† when dealing with homosexuals serving in the Armed Services. The policy was a compromise to allow homosexuals to legally serve in the military as long as they did not declare their lifestyle or engage in conduct that was in violation of military good order and discipline. Supporters viewed the law as a step forward in achieving equal rights for homosexuals. Opponents remained concerned that the policy could jeopardize morale and unit effectiveness. â€Å"The Joint Chiefs, including the chairman, had all came out against the president on gays serving in the military† (Gates 440). Over time the military was able to adapt to the new policy and restore force readiness. In 2010 the â€Å"Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell† policy was repealed and homosexuals were given the opportunity to openly serve in the milita ry. The Joint Chiefs once again objected and questioned the timing of the change. Many believe the repeal was politically motivated and a bad idea that would add additional disruption to an already strained fighting force. Every new service member must go through Basic Training for up to 12 weeks depending on the branch of service. The purpose of Basic Training is to indoctrinate the new service member into the ways of military life. New service members are taught to work as a group and set aside their individual thoughts and ideas. Strict obedience to military standardsShow MoreRelatedWar : The War Of American Citizens, And For The Security Of The American Republic1679 Words   |  7 Pagesalliances, imperialism and most importantly pride were the reasons of the start of WWI. A pride for my country not much different than mine when I was eighteen, a pride called nationalism. This pride played a factor that eventually brought young American armed forces to Europe. With WWI completely underway, America was determined to be neutral in the conflict. President Woodrow Wilson addressed America driving home the stance in which she should be, â€Å"impartial in thought as well in action.† I ve alwaysRead MoreWhat Caused The Union Of Lose The Civil War?1139 Words   |  5 PagesCaused the Union to Lose the Civil War? By Amelia E. Hicks On April 10, 1865, General Ulysses S. Grant surrendered to General Robert E. Lee of Confederate forces and delivered a farewell address to his Union soldiers, â€Å"After four years of tiring service, marked by supreme courage and commitment,† said Grant, â€Å"the Union Army has been forced to concede to overwhelming numbers and resources.† According to Grant, the Union lost the Civil War, more commonly referred to in its time as the â€Å"War of NorthernRead MoreThe Death Penalty Of The United States Essay1631 Words   |  7 Pagesattempt to abolish the death penalty, although changes were made to the method and the circumstances of killing the accused criminal, it is still alive and well. Benjamin Rush, a prestigious man who is known for his involvement in the signing of the Declaration of Independence challenged the age-old idea that capital punishment served our country as a scare tactic. This theory is referred to as the Brutalization Effect, which suggests the idea that humans no longer acknowledge the human life as a possessionRead MoreThe Oil Has Been A Hot Commodity Essay2000 Words   |  8 Pagestransmuted and then anglicized from â€Å"Izon†(also called â€Å"Ijon†, â€Å"Ijo†, or â€Å"Ujo†), meaning â€Å"truth† in their language (Ijaw Dictionary Project). They have existed harmoniously and prosperously in the delta region of Nigeria, practicing a vivacious lifestyle for centuries. However, since the 1950’s, when a wealth of natural oil was discovered in that region, these groups have been battling to preserve their health, culture, and peace in the face of a brutal globalization campaign led by oil companiesRead MoreIslam : A Religion Of Ethics, Obedience And Harmony1785 Words   |  8 Pagesis called Zakat, which is defined as â€Å"a certain percentage of one’s acquired property for the year that is paid to the needy.† Paying a charity tax with the purpose of benefiting t he poor in society is viewed as a responsibility for Muslims and a service to God. It is regarded as a type of worship and of self-purification. The fourth pillar is called the Sawm which means fasting during the month of Ramadan, and the fifth one known as Hajj is pilgrimage to Mecca, since the hajj is a set of ritualsRead MoreThe War On The United States Essay1759 Words   |  8 PagesDecember 7th 1941, the United States was blindsided by the Japanese in the worst attack on United States soil in history at the time. Without warning or even a declaration of war the Japanese attacked the Naval Station Pearl Harbor in Honolulu, Hawaii. The surprise attack destroyed and sunk two U.S. Navy battleships and severally damaged five others. The attacks also killed around 2,400 and injured around another 1,180. In return on December 8th, the next day, the United States declared war on JapanRead MoreFinancial Security, Education, Welfare, And The Freedom Essay2252 Words   |  10 Pagesdee ply in debt. This was partly due to the French alliance with the United States during the American Revolution from 1776-1781. The assistance France gave to the U.S. was a major part of the French government’s money problems, but the extravagant lifestyle of the royal family was also a contributing factor. In addition, the fall harvests of both 1787 and 1788 were very poor, and the winter of 1788-1789 was particularly harsh. To make matters worse, the population of France had increased by one-thirdRead MoreThe End Of French And Indian War1853 Words   |  8 Pagesin the colonies. The Stamp Act was a sinister conspiracy to enslave the colonials and deprive them of property and liberty. â€Æ' Essay #2 The revolutionary war in America during 1775 – 1783 was a revolution that the country had never seen before. This armed conflict between America and the Great Britain as well as its thirteen North American colonies, which called themselves as independent United States of America, led to early fighting on the North American continent. This conflict also escalated intoRead MoreThe End Of French And Indian War1854 Words   |  8 Pagesin the colonies. The Stamp Act was a sinister conspiracy to enslave the colonials and deprive them of property and liberty. â€Æ' Essay #2 The revolutionary war in America during 1775 – 1783 was a revolution that the country had never seen before. This armed conflict between America and the Great Britain as well as its thirteen North American colonies, which called themselves as independent United States of America, led to early fighting on the North American continent. This conflict also escalated intoRead MoreEssay about Early American Colonies2663 Words   |  11 PagesCharles II had to revoke the Charter that set up the colony as a result of non-compliance with navigation and trade laws. Strong religious views that coincided with a reverence for family and accountability for one’s own actions made for a strict lifestyle in the colony. The minister was considered to be the most important man within the community. To have spoken out or fallen asleep during a four hour sermon was thought to be unacceptable and a harsh punishment was handed out. Another example of

Essay on Descartes Mind and Body - 1129 Words

Descartes has a very distinct thought when thinking about the mind, and how it relates to the body, or more specifically then brain. He seems to want to explain that the mind in itself is independent from the body. A body is merely a physical entity that could be proven to be true scientifically and also can be proven through the senses. Such things are not possible with the meta-physical mind because it is independent of the body. Building on his previous premises, Descartes finally proves whether material things exist or not and determines whether his mind and body are separate from each other or not. In Meditation Six, Descartes lays the foundation for dualism which has become one of the most important arguments in philosophy.†¦show more content†¦In my eyes this does not cancel out that God is real, because it is possible that at first God created everything with good intentions, and left individuals to live and react to certain situations their own ways. He then b egins to address the problem of imagination. If he realizes that things are around him, that rules out the possibility that he is imagining such entities. He says that imagination is not essential to his existing, so he removes himself from these thoughts. After seeing this, he then attempts to see if the body truly does exist. He explains the beliefs he has about the outside world. He understands his body and such experiences it goes though, and through that he realizes that they must be present, and if they were not it would be impossible for him to feel them. He distinguishes the body from other things because the body must always be present, while other things could be merely different feelings. He here uses premises that he developed in Meditations three and four to help state that mind and body both exist, but separately. He says that his mind is different from his body, so therefore it must be separate from it. He then comes back to his Truth Rule from Meditation Fou r. â€Å"Every judgment that I make concerning matters that are â€Å"clear and distinct† to me is most assuredly true.† He says that god has made him think that his mind and body at distinctly separate, so they must be. He argues that his body and mind areShow MoreRelatedDescartes Mind and Body1480 Words   |  6 PagesDescartes’ Mind Body Dualism Rene Descartes’ main purpose is to attempt to prove that the mind that is the soul or the thinking thing is distinct and is separate from the body. This thinking thing was the core of himself, which doubts, believes, reasons, feels and thinks. Descartes considers the body to be an extended unthinking thing; therefore it is possible that one may exist without the other. This view is known as mind-body dualism. He believes that what he is thinking in his mind is what GodRead MoreDescartes’ Mind and Body Distinction817 Words   |  3 PagesDescartes’ Mind/Body Distinction This paper will attempt to explain Descartes’ first argument for the distinction that exists between mind and body. Dualism is a necessary aspect of Descartes’ metaphysics and epistemology. This distinction is important within the larger framework of Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) because after doubting everything (body, extension, senses, etc.), Descartes comes to the conclusion that because he doubts, he must be a thinking thing and therefore exist (p.43)Read MoreDescartes Proof That The Mind And The Body1568 Words   |  7 PagesDescartes’ proof that the Mind and the Body are distinct substances is as follows, First Descartes asserts that everything that can be clearly and distinctly understood is within the ability to be created by God as to correspond identically with the way that Descartes understand things in the world. It follows from this assertion that because Descartes is able to clearly and distinctly understand one thing apart from one anot her is enough to make them noticeably different in substance. DescartesRead MoreDescartes : Mind And Body Dualism735 Words   |  3 PagesDescartes was a Renaissance philosopher who affirmed the value of the deductive method (Chaplin Krawiec, 1983). This is an essential part of the scientific method where in the search for knowledge one passes from the general to the particular in a way that starting from premises of universal character particular statements are inferred. His philosophical method of questioning all propositions leads him to suggest that doubt is an act of thinking and he could not doubt that he thought, affirmingRead MoreDescartes And The Mind Body Dualism2479 Words   |  10 Pages â€Å"The mind-body dualism, in philosophy, is the fact that any theory that the mind and body are distinct kinds of substances or natures. This position implies that mind and body not only differ in meaning, but refer to different kinds of entities (Britannica).† The most basic form of dualism is substance dualism. Substance dualism is the idea that he mind and body are composed of two ontologically distinct substances. According to one who believes and studies dualism, the mind is comprised of aRead MoreDescartes on the Distinction Between Body and Mind1181 Words   |  5 PagesName Tutor Course Date Descartes Premise for Distinguishing Body and Mind In the Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes discusses the nature of the body and mind. By drawing from three lines of thought, Descartes launches a powerful premise that the body is something distinct from the mind. He conceptualizes his argument by using the uncertainty of knowledge argument, appealing to God’s omnipotence, and describing the indivisibility of the body and mind. Therefore, the purpose of this paperRead MoreDescartes Meditations And The Separation Of Mind And Body1608 Words   |  7 PagesDescartes’ Meditations take us through what can be called into doubt and what he concludes is absolutely certain. Descartes argues that the mind and body are two distinct things, but he acknowledges that they are somehow connected. Although, Scholars have noted Descartes’ argument of the separation of mind and body, they have missed the importance of how he justifies the connection between the two, because God willed it so. At the start of his meditations Descartes is sifting through his priorRead MoreDescartes: Relationship Between Mind and Body922 Words   |  4 PagesDistinction between the Mind and Body†, one important thing Descartes explores is the relationship between the mind and body. Descartes believes the mind and body are separated and they are two difference substances. He believes this to be clearly and distinctly true which is a Cartesian quality for true knowledge. I, on the other hand, disagree that the mind and body are separate and that the mind can exist without the body. First, I will present Descartes position on mind/body dualism and his proofRead MoreDescartes Dualism And The Mind Body Theory1322 Words   |  6 PagesDescartes’ Dualism Rene Descartes dualism states that the mind and body are separate entities. The mind is a nonphysical, non-spatial substance; the mind and brain are separate existences, the brain is a part of the physical body and serves as a connection between the body and mind. Dualism is a hot topic of argument on whether the theory holds any validity or if it holds any truth. However, Cartesian dualism is a credible theory and has a lot of support to verify it. One major point in DescartesRead MoreSummary Of Descartes On The Mind-Body Distinction751 Words   |  4 PagesAssignment Descartes on the Mind-Body Distinction In the Sixth Mediation, Descartes advances a compact argument for the idea that the mind and the body are distinct (2006, AT 78). In this essay, I’m going to present what I take Descartes’ argument to be, and very briefly evaluate it afterwards. Descartes starts with the thought the we can understand, at least, something, and we can understand something in a specific manner: clearly and distinctly; we can’t be wrong, according to Descartes, about things

Night Creature Blue Moon Chapter 17 Free Essays

â€Å"Maybe we’d better keep all of this between us for the time being,† he murmured. â€Å"No problem.† Like I was going to tell Clyde about the wolf god or that Cadotte believed in werewolves. We will write a custom essay sample on Night Creature: Blue Moon Chapter 17 or any similar topic only for you Order Now Hell, I wasn’t going to tell Clyde anything about Cadotte at all, unless I had to. â€Å"What else do you know?† I asked. As long as he was sharing his delusion, I preferred he share it all. â€Å"The army is begun by the one who will become the wolf god.† â€Å"Begun, how?† â€Å"‘ They’re werewolves; how do you think?† I blinked. â€Å"So the wolf god is a werewolf, too?† â€Å"Yes. There’s a ceremony that involves the totem, the werewolf army, the one who will become the wolf god, and†¦ â€Å" â€Å"And what?† â€Å"That’s all I know. The information I have is incomplete. So I ordered a book.† â€Å"A book? There’s a book on this stuff?† â€Å"There’s a book on everything. Sadly, this one is out of print. But I found a copy.† â€Å"Let me guess – on the Internet.† â€Å"Of course. Cost me a bundle, but it should explain a few things. When it shows up.† I grunted, staring at the drawings, thinking of the wolf I’d seen last night. The behavior of Karen Larson. The weird things I’d imagined about the totem. If I were a believer, I just might believe. Then again†¦ â€Å"I talked to the CDC this morning. The doctor said there is a new strain of rabies.† â€Å"Did you think they’d deny it?† â€Å"But – â€Å" â€Å"You expected them to say, ‘ Oh, no, we don’t know what that is. Why don’t you panic?’Or maybe, ‘ Sounds like a werewolf to me. Have a good time.'† â€Å"You aren’t funny.† â€Å"And I thought I was.† He patted my knee. Skin against skin, my body reacted, even though the touch had been anything but sexual. â€Å"I’m sure the CDC is working on something. But I highly doubt it’s a vaccine against a new strain of super-rabies.† â€Å"You think they lied to me?† â€Å"Of course not. The government never lies to keep the panic at bay.† â€Å"You’re being sarcastic.† He merely raised an eyebrow and shuffled his papers into a single stack. Considering Cadotte was an Indian, an activist, and a professor, I couldn’t say I was surprised he had a low opinion of the federal government. But conspiracy theories had never been my forte. They appeared to be his. â€Å"Let me ask you this,† he continued. â€Å"Did the CDC give you any advice on dealing with these superwolves?† I thought back to my conversation with Dr. Hanover. There had been one thing. â€Å"Shit.† I lifted my gaze to his. â€Å"She told me to use silver bullets.† Cadotte started to laugh. He laughed so hard he choked. I pounded him on the back, none too gently. â€Å"Hey!† he protested. â€Å"Take it easy.† He picked up his wineglass and tossed back the remainder of the content. â€Å"Silver bullets?† He shook his head. â€Å"You thought that was a normal thing to recommend?† â€Å"She had a good reason.† â€Å"Wanna share it?† â€Å"The mutated virus reacts negatively to silver.† â€Å"I’ll just bet it does.† I shook my head. I couldn’t believe we were having this conversation. â€Å"I wish we had those bodies,† I murmured. â€Å"Mighty convenient that they disappeared, wouldn’t you say?† â€Å"I suppose you have a theory on that, too.† â€Å"Of course.† â€Å"Wanna share it?† I mocked. His lips twitched, and he cast me a glance that puzzled me. Most guys would have been sick of my mouth by now. Cadotte appeared to like it quite a bit. â€Å"They changed.† â€Å"You think Karen Larson and her principal are running through the woods howling at the moon?† â€Å"You got a better idea?† â€Å"Yeah, a million of ‘ em.† â€Å"Name one.† â€Å"Someone took them.† â€Å"Why?† I tried to come up with a good reason, but I couldn’t. I threw up my hands. â€Å"How should I know?† â€Å"You have to admit strange things are happening around here.† â€Å"That doesn’t mean we’ve got werewolves. Honestly, Cadotte, have you lost your mind?† He studied me for a moment. â€Å"Why are you so dead set against this?† â€Å"Because I haven’t lost mine?† â€Å"You should keep your mind open. Isn’t that what they tell you in cop school?† â€Å"They tell us to observe only facts. Study what we can document. What we see, hear, touch is what’s real. A theory means nothing. A legend even less.† He sighed. â€Å"Jessie, I worry over you.† â€Å"I can take care of myself.† â€Å"Against human bad guys. But if you won’t believe in the inhuman ones, you could get really hurt.† He moved closer and ran his hand up my thigh. â€Å"You could get dead.† I shook my head. I couldn’t believe we were even discussing whether werewolves were real and running around in my forest. I couldn’t believe he’d supped his fingers beneath the hem of my shorts and was stroking the soft skin where my thigh met my hip. â€Å"You really believe in werewolves?† I managed. He leaned close and his breath brushed my hair. â€Å"There’s more to this world than what we can see, hear, and touch.† â€Å"Like what?† â€Å"There are things out there for which there’s no explanation.† â€Å"I’ve never heard or seen them.† â€Å"You haven’t listened; you haven’t looked.† True. Maybe I would. His finger slipped beneath the elastic leg of my panties. Later. I’d look later. His nails scraped me, his thumb rode me hard as he slid a finger inside. His mouth swallowed my cries of completion and I tasted red wine on his tongue. His moan made my lips vibrate. He continued to stroke me, slower, gentler, then more quickly. More quickly still until I was ready to explode again. What was it about this man that made all my usual inhibitions vanish the instant he touched me? â€Å"My turn,† he whispered, taking his hand out of my pants and unzipping his own. I should have been limp, sated, half-asleep; instead the thought of having him inside me at last revved me up so high I couldn’t sit still. I reached for him, clasped him, tugged him forward and back. He put his hand over mine and showed me what he liked. He was hard, smooth, and hot. I wanted him more than I’d wanted anything for a long, long time. He seemed to feel the same, since he practically tore the button off my shorts. Neither one of us heard the knock on the door. Hell, they could have been knocking for half an hour and I wouldn’t have heard them. Then someone shouted my name and started to pound. The door rattled and shook. Together we cursed and tugged our clothes back where they belonged. I hurried to the door. â€Å"This had better be good,† I said as I opened it. Edward Mandenauer stood in the hall. Some of my neighbors had come out to see what the fuss was about. They stared at him as if he were crazy. Of course they rarely saw an emaciated old man with a rifle in each hand and a bandolier full of bullets slung over each shoulder in our neck of the woods. He resembled Rambo, sixty years after his last war. â€Å"He’s with me,† I told my neighbors, and shooed them back inside. When they disappeared, albeit slowly – we didn’t get much excitement in our neck of the woods, either – I turned to Mandenauer. â€Å"What are you doing here?† â€Å"We must hunt, Jessie.† He tossed me a rifle. I had no choice but to catch the weapon or eat it. â€Å"It’s nine o’ clock. I thought we were supposed to meet at eleven.† â€Å"We meet now.† I heard Cadotte get to his feet behind me. His movement drew Mandenauer’s gaze. The old man’s eyes narrowed, and he gave Cadotte the once-over, then turned to me and did the same. My cheeks heated. It was like being caught in the backseat of a car by your grandfather. But he wasn’t my grandfather. I was over twenty-one and I was off duty, for crying out loud. â€Å"I’m busy.† â€Å"Someone has been bitten. We must go.† He turned and started down the hall. â€Å"Wait!† I called. This changed everything. Mandenauer paused. â€Å"We must get to the scene. Quickly.† I glanced down. I couldn’t go running through the woods in shorts and a shirt with no sleeves. I’d not only be scratched to pieces; I’d be eaten alive by bugs. Distractions like that destroyed a person’s concentration. Without my concentration, I could get killed – and Mandenauer along with me. â€Å"Two minutes,† I said, and ran for the bedroom. I took three, but tough. I had to get my rifle out of the safe. I put the company issue inside, grabbed a box of bullets, and ran. Cadotte and Mandenauer were staring at each other like two dogs who’d found the same bone. What was the matter with them? â€Å"I’ve got to go,† I told Cadotte. â€Å"Sorry.† And I was sorry. My life had been rolling along quite nicely when Mandenauer showed up. Cadotte nodded. â€Å"I know. I’ll just clean up and let myself out.† I hesitated. I didn’t want to leave him alone in my apartment, but his nicely stacked papers were now scattered all over my table – we must have knocked them over while we were otherwise occupied. His shoes were off. Damn, his jeans weren’t buttoned. I could see a slice of smooth, dark skin across his belly. My mouth still tasted of him. I had to get out of here. â€Å"Thanks. I – â€Å" â€Å"I’ll call you,† he said. Mandenauer snorted. I gave him a dirty look and he shrugged. â€Å"Your phones are not working. The sheriff tried to call, as did that foulmouthed harpy who says she is your friend.† Hell. I had turned off the phones. I wasn’t going to have much of an ass left when Clyde got done chewing on it. How to cite Night Creature: Blue Moon Chapter 17, Essay examples

Contraception and Abortion Movements

Question: Discuss about the Contraception and Abortion Movements. Answer: Introduction The report introduces the argument concerning the choices of abortion and morality behind it by analysis of Judith Thomsons article on defense of abortion. The paper presents the main assumptions and views of Thomson regarding abortion with use of the violinist analogy to determine the choice of abortion during pregnancy. The objection to Thomsons view is raised based on the utilitarian view that the decision to end fetus life is not based on the pain of the mother but also on the pleasures and emotional bonding of the fetus with parents and family members after birth. On that ground, a gap in Thomsons approach has been raised with support from different arguments. An attempt has been made to provide Thomsons a defense to refute the argument. There is great argument regarding whether abortion should be allowed or not and if fetus has the right to live or not. Some may regard it as living being since conception while some argue that it cannot be called living person until it reaches a certain period of development. Judith Jarvis Thomson refutes the statement that the fetus is not a living being from the moment of conception. She supports this fact because fetus begins to develop facial features, arms and legs by 6 weeks and vital organs begin to develop in the tenth week of pregnancy (Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion, 2017). Thomson thinks the right to life is more vital than right to decide what happens in the body of pregnant women. I object to her view based on contrasting idea regarding the right to life based on pregnancy occurring due to rape. Some feel the fetus have less the right to live due to pregnancy occurring due to rape. Hence on assessing Thomsons defense of abortion, it is found that she feels that even if the fetus has the right to life, they do not have the right to use pregnant womens bodies. In this aspect, she was found to support abortion on the ground of health of pregnant women. Thomson said that women can choose abortion to save her life based on certain limits to the right of self-defense (Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion. (2017). Therefore, her main view is that all abortion cannot be said to be unjust killing and fetuss right to life does not means loss of the pregnant womens right to control her own body. I would like to object to Thomsons view on grounds of utilitarian theory. The utilitarian theory states that best action is the ones that maximizes utility and well-being for maximum number of individuals. On that basis, the consequences of any act can be just based on right and wrong standards (Witt, 2016). According to utilitarian approach, I believe ethical action can be decided based on their results and the extent to which a person acts to maximize utility. Firstly, Thomson explained his argument with an example of the violinist and kidney donor. She stated a situation where a violinist with kidney ailment is attached to another persons circulatory system to use his kidney for blood extraction. Here the donor is forced to be plugged with the violinist along with the condition that it is just for nine months and then he will be unplugged from the patient. Thomson questions whether a person faced with similar situation should accede to this situation (Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defe nse of Abortion, 2017). However, it cannot be denied that the relationship between a fetus and pregnant women is not the same as that of violinist and kidney donor. Thomson has focused on the pain and suffering of pregnant women due to fetus, however she has overlooked the emotional bonding and attachment of the fetus with the mother and her extended family members. For Thomson, the suffering of a pregnant woman is more on avoiding abortion; however the other aspect is that continuing pregnancy may bring new experience of happiness due to motherhood. The parents and impact on extended family also need to be considered during abortion as this may changes the possibilities of pleasure over pain for a fetus after birth (Allan, 2015). Thomsons defense of abortion relied on biological complexities in pregnant women, however in order to decide on the ethical rationale for going for abortion, both biological and conceptual complexities needs to be considered. Thomsons view of abortion has certain gaps. In the violinist illustration, the woman denies a life giving treatment. However in the case of abortion, a humans beings life is taken away actively through poisoning and the emotional bonding is missing in the violinist illustration (Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion. (2017). In case of violinist, the relation is that of stranger-stranger relationship which can never be compared with mother-child relationship (Theofanidis, Fountouki, Pediaditaki, 2013). The violinist analogy of Thomson suggests that a woman has no responsibility for the health of the violinist and she must protect her own body first. However, in reality the fetus is not a stranger for pregnant women and a mother has emotional attachment t o the baby. Therefore, blood relationships are not based on choice but moral obligation (Unstringing the Violinist | Stand to Reason, 2017).Hence, overall impact not just on the mothers body but also on her pleasures post-pregnancy should be considered before deciding on abortion. Objection or second reply In response to the objection raised for Thomsons view on abortion, Thomson can refute the view by stating that she used the violinist analogy to explain the situation of a pregnant women considering women and what conflicts might arise in her mind at that time. Thomson supported the mothers right of body use because she felt that a mother may decide best what is good for her and her baby. If she is not able to give a good life to her baby post birth, then her decision to go for abortion is ethical as well as beneficial in the long run too. Therefore, under certain complex circumstances during pregnancy, the mothers right to body is also crucial apart from the fetuss right to life. Therefore, every choice is dependent on the level of extension of moral obligations of a person (Porter, 2013). Conclusion The report brought into focus the argument raised by Judith Thomson in her article A Defense of Abortion and discussed her view point regarding abortion. Thomson believes the fetus has the right to life but also regards the pregnant womens right to her body as an integral choice during pregnancy. If a pregnant woman feels that pregnancy may harm her body, she may decide to go for abortion. Her argument was based on the scenario of a violinist and a kidney donor. However, the argument raised against Thomsons abortion view, based on utilitarian theory opposed that the violinist-kidney donor relation cannot be compared with mother-child relationship and the benefits and losses of abortion should be decided based on the overall impact not just on pregnant women but also her extended family members. Reference Allan, L. (2015). Contraception and Abortion: A Utilitarian View.URL= https://www. RationalRealm. com/philosophy/ethics/contraception-abortion-utilitari an-view. html. Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion. (2017).Spot.colorado.edu. Retrieved 4 January 2017, from https://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil160,Fall02/thomson.htm Piontelli, A. (2014).Development of normal fetal movements. Springer. Porter, L. (2013). Abortion, infanticide and moral context.Journal of medical ethics,39(5), 350-352. Theofanidis, D., Fountouki, A., Pediaditaki, O. (2013). To abort or not? A Greek dilemmacase study.Nurse education today,33(6), 644-647. Unstringing the Violinist | Stand to Reason. (2017).Str.org. Retrieved 4 January 2017, from https://www.str.org/articles/unstringing-the-violinist#.WGyzntJ97IU Witt, U. (2016). The transformations of utility theory: a behavioral perspective.Journal of Bioeconomics,18(3), 211-228.